Skip to main content

Table 5 Pairwise comparisons between the Pfam S matrix and other matrices estimated by the FastMG procedure

From: FastMG: a simple, fast, and accurate maximum likelihood procedure to estimate amino acid replacement rate matrices from large data sets

M1

M2

LogLK (M1-M2)

M1 > M2 (#TP)

M1 < M2 (#TP)

#M1 > M2 (#TP)

#M1 < M2 (#TP)

PfamS

Pfam 8 R

0.01

299 (67)

181 (41)

119 (8)

55 (8)

PfamS

Pfam 16 R

0.01

294 (54)

186 (35)

132 (6)

55 (3)

PfamS

Pfam 24 R

0.01

309 (57)

171 (38)

142 (10)

51 (3)

PfamS

Pfam 32 R

0.00

275 (40)

205 (35)

116 (6)

65 (2)

PfamS

Pfam 64 R

0.00

279 (38)

201 (28)

117 (4)

64 (3)

PfamS

Pfam 8 T

0.00

218 (54)

262 (64)

51 (3)

80 (8)

PfamS

Pfam 16 T

0.00

190 (33)

290 (51)

41 (2)

104 (6)

PfamS

Pfam 24 T

0.00

212 (33)

268 (39)

50 (2)

82 (1)

PfamS

Pfam 32 T

0.00

233 (36)

247 (36)

58 (1)

72 (0)

PfamS

Pfam 64 T

0.00

166 (21)

314 (31)

27 (0)

91 (2)

  1. LogLK: the log likelihood difference per site between trees inferred using M1 and M2; a positive (negative) value means M1 is better (worse) than M2. M1 > M2: the number of alignments where M1 results in better likelihood value than M2; #TP: the number of alignments where tree topologies inferred using M1 and M2 are different. #M1 > M2 (p <0.05): the number of alignments where the Kishino-Hasegawa test indicates that M1 is significantly better than M2. #M2 > M1 (p <0.05): the same as #M1 > M2, but now M2 is significantly better than M1.