Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of running times for different tools

From: eCAMBer: efficient support for large-scale comparative analysis of multiple bacterial strains

Dataset

CAMBer

eCAMBer

Mugsy-Ann.

GMV

2 strains of

7 m 31 s

26 s

2 m

21 m

S. aureus

    

9 strains of M.

4 h 12 m

2 m 37 s

1 h 25 m

13 h 53 m

tuberculosis

    

22 strains of

37 h 5 m

16 m 30 s

4 h 11 m

28 h 36 m

S. aureus

    

41 strains of

273 h 22 m

1 h 48 m

19 h 21 m

368 h 31 m

E. coli

    
  1. Comparison of running times between eCAMBer, CAMBer, Mugsy-Annotator and the GMV pipeline on four datasets from our previous work on CAMBer. All computations were executed on a machine with 1 processor core being used. The machine used in this computational experiment was different than the one used in the previous experiment. Columns correspond, in left-to-right order, to: short detaset description, total time consumed by the closure procedure in CAMBer, total time consumed by eCAMBer, total time consumed by Mugsy-Annotator, total time consumed the the GMV pipeline.
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us