Figure 6

Contig comparison through network and genome map comparison. A. Contig network including 6 contigs affiliated to Lactococcus phage 1706. Each contig and reference genomes are displayed as nodes, and BLAST similarities are displayed as edges. In this network, we chose to color nodes according to the taxonomy of the reference genomes, and to keep links between nodes only when two genes or more were found to be similar between the two sequences. B. Map comparison for contigs and genomes selected in the network (highlighted in yellow in A). The maps of these five selected sequences are vertically stacked, and BLAST hits between genes of two consecutive maps are depicted with gray frames. Sequences were re-ordered to display similarities between Lactococcus phage 1706 and the two contigs, as well as similarities between these contigs and Clostridium phages. In both network and map comparison, the contig names were simplified: complete name of contig 187_43 is 1470_2012_5M_iter1_k63_scaffold187_43.0, contig 298_22.4 is 1470_2012_5M_iter2_k47_ scaffold298_22.4, contig 334_19.8 is 1470_2012_5M_iter2_k47_scaffold334_19.8, contig 1977_14.5 is 1470_1013_5M_iter6_k39_scaffold1977_14.5, contig 271_28.5 is 1470_2012_5M_iter2_k47_ scaffold271_28.5, and contig 1957_11.1 is 1470_1013_5M_iter6_k39_scaffold1957_11.1.