Skip to main content

Table 8 R 2 performance on test set 2

From: Multi-model inference using mixed effects from a linear regression based genetic algorithm

Variable selection

LASSO

GA-OLS

GA-MM

Variable estimation

Coef (shrinkage)

OLS

MM

OLS

MM

MMI1

MMI2

OLS

MM

MMI1

MMI2

      

OLS

MM

OLS

MM

  

OLS

MM

OLS

MM

TOP15 variables

0.667

0.734

0.712

0.707

0.707

0.708

0.708

0.709

0.710

0.709

0.702

0.705

0.696

0.706

0.698

TOP18 variables

0.690

0.731

0.713

0.721

0.718

0.716

0.714

0.722

0.719

0.768

0.770

0.742

0.742

0.747

0.750

TOP21 variables

0.742

0.760

0.765

0.736

0.730

0.722

0.717

0.732

0.726

0.777

0.775

0.746

0.744

0.751

0.752

TOP24 variables

0.745

0.771

0.768

0.732

0.728

0.720

0.716

0.727

0.723

0.762

0.761

0.743

0.740

0.748

0.749

TOP27 variables

0.767

0.788

0.788

0.721

0.725

0.720

0.717

0.732

0.726

0.770

0.768

0.744

0.741

0.758

0.755

TOP30 variables

0.777

0.789

0.787

0.768

0.772

0.731

0.729

0.747

0.743

nac

nac

nac

nac

nac

nac

ALL m variables a

0.787

0.770

0.776

nab

nab

0.733

0.729

0.741

0.733

nab

nab

0.747

0.745

0.754

0.749

 

(m = 51)

  

(m = 193)

  

(m = 200)

  1. am is the number of variables with presence in the GA solutions or with abs(coef) > 0 in the LASSO solution path. bnot calculated due to singularity.
  2. cno model with exactly 30 mutations.
  3. In bold the highest R2 per row is indicated.