From: Structure prediction of polyglutamine disease proteins: comparison of methods
run | # 2 | # 3 | # 4 | # 5 | # 6 | # 7 | # 8 | # 9 | # 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# 1 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.63 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.46 |
# 2 | Â | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.46 |
# 3 | Â | Â | 0.54 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.51 |
# 4 | Â | Â | Â | 0.50 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.49 |
# 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.54 |
# 6 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.51 | 0.68 | 0.54 | 0.49 |
# 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.45 |
# 8 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.50 | 0.52 |
# 9 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.50 |