From: Structure prediction of polyglutamine disease proteins: comparison of methods
run | # 2 | # 3 | # 4 | # 5 | # 6 | # 7 | # 8 | # 9 | # 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# 1 | 0.30 | 0.43 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.43 |
# 2 | Â | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.38 |
# 3 | Â | Â | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.50 |
# 4 | Â | Â | Â | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.68 | 0.49 | 0.43 |
# 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.61 |
# 6 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.59 |
# 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.41 | 0.56 | 0.55 |
# 8 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.46 | 0.42 |
# 9 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.60 |