Skip to main content

Table 1 Previously identified motifs

From: Detecting epigenetic motifs in low coverage and metagenomics settings

Species Motif % Modified Study
E. coli G m6ATC 94.1 Fang 2012
E. coli ACC m6ACC 93.2 Fang 2012
E. coli CTGCm6AG 96.3 Fang 2012
G. metallireducens G m6ATCC 99.2 Murray 2012
G. metallireducens GG m6ATC 98.7 Murray 2012
G. metallireducens TCC m6AGG 98.2 Murray 2012
B. Cereus ATCC 10987 CGA m6AG 93.3 Murray 2012
B. Cereus ATCC 10987 A m4CGGC 33.8 Murray 2012
B. Cereus ATCC 10987 TGC m4CG 47.5 Murray 2012
C. Jejuni 81-176 RA m6ATTY 99.0 Murray 2012
C. Jejuni 81-176 GCA m6AGG 97.7 Murray 2012
C. Jejuni 81-176 GGRC m6A 97.6 Murray 2012
C. Jejuni NCTC 11168 RA m6ATTY 99.2 Murray 2012
C. Jejuni NCTC 11168 GKA m6AYG 98.2 Murray 2012
C. Salexigens RG m6ATCY 76.5 Murray 2012
  1. Motifs from previous studies [3, 4] used to validate the new method. Degenerate bases are identified via corresponding IUPAC symbols. The "RG m6ATCY" motif consensus corresponds to 4 distinct motifs.