Skip to main content

Table 5 Precision in SMAL and native MNA implementations

From: Global multiple protein-protein interaction network alignment by combining pairwise network alignments

NForH

IsoRankN

SMETANA

IsoRankN

SMETANA

IsoRankN

SMETANA

IsoRankN

SMETANA

Relative change

in precision

Droso

Droso

Human

Human

Mouse

Mouse

Yeast

Yeast

4-species

-5.82%

-11.13%

-10.21%

-3.74%

-6.44%

-2.03%

NA

NA

5-species

8.24%

-13.41%

-1.20%

-9.97%

-6.67%

-7.83%

-21.59%

0.24%

6-species

9.27%

-13.67%

1.89%

-12.02%

-2.74%

-10.39%

-21.83%

-1.79%

7-species

5.07%

-13.99%

2.79%

-9.50%

-0.34%

-9.86%

-24.33%

-1.52%

8-species

-5.05%

1211.83%

-4.18%

1239.56%

-1.17%

1534.16%

-24.44%

1697.95%

  1. Comparison of alignment precision with regards to the NForH measure as expressed by Equation (26). Values represent the relative change in precision using the native implementation as the reference according to Equation (27). Positive values in the table correspond to alignments where SMAL was more precise than the native implementation. Negative values appear when SMAL was less precise. Since Yeast was not part of the 4-species MNA, no value is presented in the respective cells.