Table 13 Overall difference in performance of methods on the MSA data set. Symbols as for Table 11.
From: OXBench: A benchmark for evaluation of protein multiple sequence alignment accuracy
| Â | AMPS | CLUSTALW | PILEUP | PRRP | PIMA | DIALIGN | MSA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMPS | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
CLUSTALW | -0.73 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
PILEUP | -0.67‡ | 0.06 |  |  |  |  |  |
PRRP | -1.53§ | -0.80§ | -0.86‡ |  |  |  |  |
PIMA | -1.22§ | -0.48†| -0.54 | 0.32†|  |  |  |
DIALIGN | -6.77§ | -6.03§ | -6.10§ | -5.23§ | -5.55§ |  |  |
MSA | -1.44§ | -0.70†| -0.76 | 0.10‡ | -0.22 | 5.33§ |  |
T-COFFEE | 1.71§ | 2.45§ | 2.39§ | 3.25§ | 2.93§ | 8.48§ | 3.15§ |