Figure 4

Comparison of AVID with a naïve Bayesian network. The performance of a naïve Bayesian net, as described by Jansen et al. [21], is compared to that of AVID, using the same input data and same measures of performance. The plots show the ratio of true positives to false positives (TP/FP) vs. coverage (TP/P). The Bayesian net results are in open triangles, AVID stages 1 and 2 in open circles and AVID stages 1, 2 and 3 in closed circles. The performance of AVID is notably superior at higher coverage. At low coverage, all methods can achieve high accuracy.