Skip to main content

Table 4 Task 2.1 results. The table shows the results of task 2.1 for each participant.

From: Evaluation of BioCreAtIvE assessment of task 2

Participant Run Evaluated results Perfect prediction Correct protein/general GO
Ehrler et al. [20] 1 1048 268 (25.57%) 74 (7.06%)
Krymolowski et al. [26] 1 1053 166 (15.76%) 77 (7.31%)
Krymolowski et al. [26] 2 1050 166 (15.81%) 90 (8.57%)
Krymolowski et al. [26] 3 1050 154 (14.67%) 86 (8.19%)
Verspoor et al. [21] 1 1057 272 (25.73%) 154 (14.57%)
Verspoor et al. [21] 2 1864 43 (2.31%) 40 (2.15%)
Verspoor et al. [21] 3 1703 66 (3.88%) 40 (2.35%)
Chiang I et al. [25] 1 251 125 (49.80%) 13 (5.18%)
Chiang I et al. [25] 2 70 33 (47.14%) 5 (7.14%)
Chiang I et al. [25] 3 89 41 (46.07%) 7 (7.87%)
Chiang II et al. [25] 1 45 36 (80.00%) 3 (6.67%)
Chiang II et al. [25] 2 59 45 (76.27%) 2 (3.39%)
Chiang II et al. [25] 3 64 50 (78.12%) 4 (6.25%)
Krallinger et al. [22] 1 1050 303 (28.86%) 69 (6.57%)
Rice et al. [23] 1 524 59 (11.26%) 28 (5.34%)
Rice et al. [23] 2 998 125 (12.53%) 69 (6.91%)
Ray et al. [24] 1 413 83 (20.10%) 19 (4.60%)
Ray et al. [24] 2 458 7 (1.53%) 0 (0.00%)
Couto et al. [19] 1 1048 301 (28.72%) 57 (5.44%)
Couto et al. [19] 2 1048 280 (26.72) 60 (5.73%)
Couto et al. [19] 3 1050 239 (22.76) 59 (5.62%)