Skip to main content

Table 2 Results across all users for BioCreAtIvE Task 2.2.

From: Protein annotation as term categorization in the gene ontology using word proximity networks

User, Run # results "perfect" "generally"
4, 1 661 78 (11.80%) 49 (7.41%)
7, 1 153 1 (0.65%) 1 (0.65%)
7, 2 384 19 (4.95%) [1] 9 (2.34%) [1]
7, 3 263 2 (0.76%) 10 (3.80%)
9, 1 28 9 (32.14%) 3 (10.71%)
9, 2 41 14 (34.15%) 1 (2.44%)
9, 3 41 14 (34.15%) 1 (2.44%)
10, 1 120 35 (29.17%) 8 (6.67%)
10, 2 86 24 (27.91%) 6 (6.98%)
10, 3 116 37 (31.90%) 11 (9.48%)
15, 1 502 3 (0.60%) 8 (1.59%)
15, 2 485 16 (3.30%) 26 (5.36%)
17, 1 247 52 (21.05%) [1] 23 (9.31%) [0]
17, 2 55 1 (1.82%) 0 (0.00%)
17, 3 99 1 (1.01%) 1 (1.01%)
20, 1 673 20 (2.97%) 30 (4.46%)
20, 2 672 38 (5.65%) 26 (3.87%)
20, 3 673 58 (8.62%) 27 (4.01%)
  1. Evaluation results on the evidence text selected for Task 2.2. See legend for Table 1. In this task, evaluation of the GO node reference was done with respect to the predicted GO annotation provided by the system.