Skip to main content

Table 2 Results across all users for BioCreAtIvE Task 2.2.

From: Protein annotation as term categorization in the gene ontology using word proximity networks

User, Run

# results

"perfect"

"generally"

4, 1

661

78 (11.80%)

49 (7.41%)

7, 1

153

1 (0.65%)

1 (0.65%)

7, 2

384

19 (4.95%) [1]

9 (2.34%) [1]

7, 3

263

2 (0.76%)

10 (3.80%)

9, 1

28

9 (32.14%)

3 (10.71%)

9, 2

41

14 (34.15%)

1 (2.44%)

9, 3

41

14 (34.15%)

1 (2.44%)

10, 1

120

35 (29.17%)

8 (6.67%)

10, 2

86

24 (27.91%)

6 (6.98%)

10, 3

116

37 (31.90%)

11 (9.48%)

15, 1

502

3 (0.60%)

8 (1.59%)

15, 2

485

16 (3.30%)

26 (5.36%)

17, 1

247

52 (21.05%) [1]

23 (9.31%) [0]

17, 2

55

1 (1.82%)

0 (0.00%)

17, 3

99

1 (1.01%)

1 (1.01%)

20, 1

673

20 (2.97%)

30 (4.46%)

20, 2

672

38 (5.65%)

26 (3.87%)

20, 3

673

58 (8.62%)

27 (4.01%)

  1. Evaluation results on the evidence text selected for Task 2.2. See legend for Table 1. In this task, evaluation of the GO node reference was done with respect to the predicted GO annotation provided by the system.