Table 3 Simulation results for sample identification with four different RES and WIN settings.â€
| Â | Â | RES (sample mass resolution threshold, daltons) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â | 1 | 5 | ||
WIN (catalog mass selection threshold, daltons) | 1 | Gab.diaztr | 89.29% | * Mc.janrrnB | 74.83% |
| Â | Â | Rpl.globi2 | 90.91% | Adm.metha2 | 75.00% |
| Â | Â | * Acdp.spC1 | 91.55% | Gab.diaztr | 76.43% |
| Â | Â | Mc.janrrnA | 95.10% | Bif.lactis | 76.81% |
| Â | Â | * Mc.janrrnB | 95.80% | Rpl.globi2 | 77.27% |
| Â | 3 | Mc.janrrnA | 97.90% | Rpl.globi2 | 97.73% |
| Â | Â | * Acdp.spC1 | 100.00% | Mc.janrrnA | 97.90% |
| Â | Â | * M.sturniT | 100.00% | * Acdp.spC1 | 100.00% |
| Â | Â | * Mc.janrrnB | 100.00% | * Mc.janrrnB | 100.00% |
| Â | Â | * Tmms.chrmg | 100.00% | * Tmms.chrmg | 100.00% |