Table 6 Comparison of REGAL vs. PREP-Mt. To compare performance between REGAL and PREP-Mt [8], we had to recalculate the reported values for specificity and accuracy as described in the text. We have compared performance for the three mitochondrial genomes that were shared in common between the PREP-Mt and REGAL analyses.
From: Genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to RNA editing site prediction
PREP-Mt | REGAL | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity | Positive Predictive Value | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | |
A. thaliana | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.86 |
B. napus | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.86 |
O. sativa | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.88 |
Overall | 0.82 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.87 |