Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of three ncRNA detection programs on a whole genome screen using WuBLASTn genomic windows.

From: Detection of non-coding RNAs on the basis of predicted secondary structure formation free energy change

 

probability cutoff for ncRNA classification

 
 

P > 0.5

P > 0.9

P > 0.99

 
 

Dynalign

RNAz

Dynalign

RNAz

Dynalign

RNAz

QRNA

Known ncRNAs found (percent of total known ncRNAs in parentheses)

E. coli (156 ncRNAs known)

147 (94.23)

148 (94.87)

141 (90.38)

140 (89.74)

128 (82.05)

124 (79.49)

121 (77.56)

S. typhi (110 ncRNAs known)

109 (99.09)

108 (98.18)

107 (97.27)

106 (96.36)

103 (93.64)

95 (86.36)

100 (90.91)

Number of contiguous, non-overlapping hits that are not known ncRNAs (i.e. novel ncRNA candidates)

E. coli

2,569

1,898

1,828

1,568

1,211

1,257

1,403

S. typhi

3,936

2,503

2,440

1,986

1,520

1,520

1,611

Number of nucleotides classified as ncRNA that are not in known ncRNAs (i.e. nucleotides in novel ncRNA candidates)

E. coli (each strand = 4,639,675 nt)

324,033

275,704

235,227

221,802

167,157

174,682

206,840

S. typhi (each strand = 4,809,037 nt)

514,650

387,099

352,039

296,608

235,018

220,485

248,724

Total number of nucleotides classified as ncRNA (i.e. nucleotides in both known and unknown ncRNAs)

E. coli (each strand = 4,639,675 nt)

385,611

332,000

292,940

270,267

220,352

209,807

242,534

S. typhi (each strand = 4,809,037 nt)

570,994

436,137

405,022

338,254

283,999

250,610

283,508

  1. QRNA, RNAz, and the Dynalign/LIBSVM classifier are compared in their ability to detect known ncRNA in the E. coli and S. typhi genomes, based on genomic scanning windows prepared using WuBLASTn. For RNAz and the Dynalign/LIBSVM classifier, results are listed for three P value classification cutoffs. "Number of nucleotides" = number of nucleotides on the plus strand + number of nucleotides on the minus strand, not accounting for overlap of complementary strands.