From: Quality control for terms and definitions in ontologies and taxonomies
Q1: Is the definition not circular, i.e. does the definition provide more information than the term itself? | Q2: Is the definition intelligible, i.e. did you roughly understand the meaning of the GO entry by reading the definition? | Q3: Is the definition intelligible, i.e. are you able to fully understand the meaning of the GO entry without requiring further reading of other sources? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Person score | Circular> | Not Circular | Intelligible | Not Intelligible | Intelligible | Not Intelligible |
Biol. 1 – PostDoc | 6/50 | 49/50 | 49/50 | 44/50 | 29/50 | 3/50 |
Biol. 2 – PostDoc | 1/50 | 48/50 | 50/50 | 22/50 | 40/50 | 1/50 |
Biol. 3 – BSc | 1/50 | 46/50 | 44/50 | 49/50 | 45/50 | 2/50 |
Bioinf. – MSc | 3/50 | 46/50 | 45/50 | 4/50 | 48/50 | 1/50 |