Skip to main content

Table 4 The success rates and the average Z-scores of different potentials on the multiple decoy sets

From: Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at the profile level

Source

4state

Lattice_ssfit

Lmds

Fisa

Fisa_casp3

Summary

DFIRD-SCM

6/7 (3.94)a

8/8 (6.19)

3/10 (2.56)

3/4 (4.70)

3/3 (6.05)

23/32 (4.68)

Distance

5/7 (2.48)

6/8 (4.97)

2/10 (1.78)

2/4 (3.06)

1/3 (1.93)

16/32 (2.84)

Distance_profile

7/7 (3.53)

8/8 (5.72)

3/10 (2.45)

2/4 (3.32)

2/3 (2.94)

22/32 (3.59)

Contact

3/7 (1.38)

4/8 (2.32)

1/10 (0.83)

0/4 (0.65)

0/3 (1.69)

8/32 (1.37)

Contact_profile

3/7 (1.52)

5/8 (2.96)

1/10 (1.15)

0/4 (0.72)

0/3 (1.73)

9/32 (1.61)

Dihedral

7/7 (2.69)

6/8 (3.51)

2/10 (1.62)

1/4 (1.05)

1/3 (1.72)

17/32 (2.12)

Dihedral_profile

7/7 (2.72)

7/8 (3.88)

3/10 (1.55)

1/4 (1.22)

2/3 (2.58)

20/32 (2.39)

Surface

4/7 (1.80)

4/8 (3.15)

3/10 (1.21)

1/4 (1.28)

2/3 (2.26)

14/32 (1.94)

Surface_profile

4/7 (2.07)

4/8 (3.57)

5/10 (2.68)

2/4 (1.89)

2/3 (2.96)

17/32 (2.64)

  1. aThe first number is the number of native structures ranked as number one; the second number is total number of proteins in the decoy set. The numbers in parentheses are the average Z-scores. The results of DFIRD-SCM method are directly taken from Zhang et al., Protein Sci. 2004, 13: 400–411.