Skip to main content

Table 7 The 51 genes contributing the most to the non-ethanol signature as defined by the maximum curvature in Figure 13 B.

From: A novel data mining method to identify assay-specific signatures in functional genomic studies

Gene Name Rank Expression Ratio Gene Name Rank Expression Ratio Gene Name Rank Expression Ratio
ygjK 1 -20.9 nagE 18 -4.8 ygfK 35 -6.6
tktA 2 -5.2 kdpB 19 -4.0 trpD 36 -8.7
dsbC 3 -8.5 tufA 20 -2.0 gshA 37 -1.8
cvrA 4 -2.3 alsE 21 -14.8 yejA 38 -4.7
nrfE 5 -11.9 aidB 22 -4.3 rplX 39 -2.8
yehI 6 -19.2 fusA 23 -2.9 ygbE 40 -7.9
ybbA 7 -4.1 ybhH 24 -5.7 yqjI 41 -4.2
evgS 8 -16.2 ybeQ 25 -6.3 glnS 42 -2.1
ynfE 9 -14.4 rplO 26 -5.0 yoaD 43 -240.1
pqiB 10 -3.7 betT 27 -2.4 cyaA 44 -4.4
bglA 11 -2.0 leuA 28 -4.1 amiA 45 -3.4
dnaN 12 -1.7 norV 29 -2.9 lon 46 -6.4
feoB 13 -25.9 deaD 30 -2.2 yhgF 47 -3.4
yphG 14 -7.0 tufB 31 -1.8 hscC 48 -22.1
arcB 15 -10.4 gppA 32 -4.8 infC 49 -1.8
rne 16 -6.9 alaS 33 -5.0 yfiE 50 -5.8
yehU 17 -3.8 rplD 34 -7.7 rplP 51 -4.7
  1. Expression ratios are calculated by dividing as the average expression level of a gene in the 8 cultures not exposed to ethanol by the average expression level in the 4 ethanol-challenged cultures. A negative sign has been included to indicate that these genes are down-regulated as the result of the ethanol challenge.