Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of REGAL vs. PREP-Mt.

From: Erratum to: genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to RNA editing site site prediction

 

PREP-Mt

REGAL

 

Sensitivity

Positive Predictive Value

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Specificity (PPV)

Accuracy

A. thaliana

0.79

0.86

0.82

0.91

0.85 (0.86)

0.88

B. napus

0.87

0.87

0.87

0.89

0.81 (0.82)

0.85

O. sativa

0.81

0.85

0.83

0.87

0.82 (0.81)

0.84

Overall

0.82

0.86

0.84

0.89

0.83 (0.83)

0.86

  1. To compare performance between REGAL and PREP-Mt [9], we had to recalculate the reported values for specificity and accuracy as described in [1]. We have compared performance for the three mitochondrial genomes that were shared in common between the PREP-Mt and REGAL analyses. We report both specificity and PPV (in parentheses) for our results.
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us