Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison between community organization at α = 10% and connected component organization at α = 5%.

From: Correlated fragile site expression allows the identification of candidate fragile genes involved in immunity and associated with carcinogenesis

cluster organization at α = 5% :

A5

FRA1C

FRA1D

FRA1E

FRA1G

FRA2D

FRA2H

FRA3C

FRA5D

FRA5E

FRA6E

7p14

FRA7G

FRA9C

 

FRA10F

FRA11D

FRA13A

FRA18A

FRA20B

FRA22B

FRAXB

FRAXC

     

B5

FRA3B

FRA7F

FRA7H

FRA14C

FRA16C

FRA16D

       

C5

14q21

18p11

           

community organization at α = 10% :

com. no 1

FRA1C

FRA1D

FRA1E

FRA1G

1q43

FRA2D

FRA2H

FRA3C

FRA5D

FRA5E

FRA6E

7p14

FRA7B

 

FRA7G

FRA9C

FRA10F

FRA11D

FRA13A

14q21

18p11

FRA18A

FRA20B

FRA22B

FRAXB

FRAXC

 

com. no 2

FRA3B

FRA7F

FRA7H

FRA14C

FRA16C

FRA16D

       
  1. Communities identified at α = 10% appear as connected components at more stringent significance levels. The two communities at α = 10% coincide respectively with A5 and B5 at α = 5% except for C5 which is enclosed in the larger community. C5's fragile sites are highlighted by italic font typing.