Table 5 Comparison of prediction performances between NBA-Palm and CSS-Palm.
From: NBA-Palm: prediction of palmitoylation site implemented in Naïve Bayes algorithm
Program | 3-fold cross-validation | Jack-Knife validation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cut-off | Ac (%) | Sn (%) | Sp (%) | MCC | Cut-off | Ac (%) | Sn (%) | Sp (%) | MCC | |
CSS-Palm | 4 | 43.34% | 40.84% | 100.00% | 0.1667 | 4 | 87.00% | 50.65% | 97.62% | 0.5946 |
2.6 | 68.75% | 67.78% | 88.89% | 0.2398 | 2.6 | 82.94% | 82.16% | 83.17% | 0.5877 | |
1.5 | 88.70% | 90.66% | 44.44% | 0.2247 | 1.5 | 56.67% | 97.12% | 44.86% | 0.3672 | |
NBA-Palm | 0.869 | 86.61% | 40.70% | 100.00% | 0.5891 | 0.745 | 86.66% | 50.24% | 97.23% | 0.5809 |
0.359 | 85.78% | 67.90% | 91.00% | 0.5916 | 0.406 | 86.67% | 67.46% | 92.25% | 0.6102 | |
0.011 | 60.78% | 90.90% | 52.00% | 0.3630 | 0.016 | 56.41% | 94.73% | 45.28% | 0.3475 | |