Skip to main content

Table 4 Schematic illustration of a contingency table, and the derived statistics

From: Evaluation of clustering algorithms for protein-protein interaction networks

Counts

T

cluster 1

cluster 2

cluster 3

cluster 4

cluster 5

sum

complex size

complex 1

7

0

0

0

0

7

7

complex 2

0

6

8

0

0

14

14

complex 3

0

0

0

14

3

17

20

complex 4

0

0

0

4

5

9

8

sum

7

6

8

18

8

47

 

cluster size

7

6

8

16

8

  

Positive Predictive Value (PPV)

PPV

cluster 1

cluster 2

cluster 3

cluster 4

cluster 5

  

complex 1

1

0

0

0

0

  

complex 2

0

1

1

0

0

  

complex 3

0

0

0

0.78

0.38

  

complex 4

0

0

0

0.22

0.62

  

cluster-wise PPV

1

1

1

0.78

0.62

  

Sensitivity

Sn

cluster 1

cluster 2

cluster 3

cluster 4

cluster 5

complex-wise Sn

 

complex 1

1

0

0

0

0

1

 

complex 2

0

0.43

0.57

0

0

0.57

 

complex 3

0

0

0

0.70

0.15

0.70

 

complex 4

0

0

0

0.50

0.62

0.62

 

Frequency per row

F row

cluster 1

cluster 2

cluster 3

cluster 4

cluster 5

  

complex 1

1

0

0

0

0

  

complex 2

0

0.43

0.57

0

0

  

complex 3

0

0

0

0.82

0.18

  

complex 4

0

0

0

0.44

0.56

  

Separation

C

cluster 1

cluster 2

cluster 3

cluster 4

cluster 5

complex-wise separation

 

complex 1

1

0

0

0

0

1

 

complex 2

0

0.43

0.57

0

0

1

 

complex 3

0

0

0

0.64

0.07

0.71

 

complex 4

0

0

0

0.10

0.35

0.45

 

cluster-wise separation

1

0.43

0.57

0.74

0.41

  
  1. Clustering-wise sensitivity 0.69
  2. Clustering-wise PPV 0.85
  3. Accuracy 0.77
  4. Average cluster-wise separation 0.63
  5. Average complex-wise separation 0.79
  6. Clustering-wise separation 0.70