Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance comparison for multi-class datasets (continued).

From: Recursive gene selection based on maximum margin criterion: a comparison with SVM-RFE

Classifier+Selection criterion

Number of genes

 

10

20

30

50

100

CNS

     

NMC+BW

31.1 ± 1.3

23.1 ± 1.2

20.1 ± 1.1

18.3 ± 1.0

15.9 ± 1.0

NMC+MMC-RFE(U)

27.2 ± 1.1

22.8 ± 0.9

21.9 ± 0.9

19.4 ± 0.8

16.8 ± 0.8

NMC+MMC-RFE(O)

24.4 ± 1.0

22.7 ± 0.8

22.1 ± 0.9

20.6 ± 0.9

18.9 ± 0.8

NMC+SVM-RFE(H)

45.6 ± 1.3

35.4 ± 1.0

33.3 ± 1.0

28.8 ± 0.9

24.9 ± 0.8

NMC+SVM-RFE(S)

45.4 ± 1.3

34.9 ± 1.0

32.5 ± 0.9

27.6 ± 0.8

24.6 ± 0.8

MMC+MMC-RFE(U)

27.6 ± 1.1

22.5 ± 0.9

21.3 ± 0.9

19.2 ± 0.8

16.9 ± 0.8

MMC+MMC-RFE(O)

24.4 ± 1.0

22.9 ± 0.8

22.2 ± 0.9

20.2 ± 0.9

19.4 ± 0.8

SVM+SVM-RFE(H)

54.0 ± 1.5

42.6 ± 1.4

36.8 ± 1.3

31.0 ± 0.9

25.2 ± 0.8

SVM+SVM-RFE(S)

47.3 ± 1.2

37.7 ± 1.1

32.6 ± 1.1

28.4 ± 1.0

26.6 ± 0.9

NCI60

     

NMC+BW

49.8 ± 1.2

44.0 ± 1.0

41.6 ± 1.0

39.1 ± 0.8

37.7 ± 0.7

NMC+MMC-RFE(U)

46.4 ± 0.8

38.9 ± 0.8

34.0 ± 0.9

29.8 ± 0.9

26.8 ± 0.7

NMC+MMC-RFE(O)

48.2 ± 0.9

39.6 ± 0.9

35.0 ± 0.9

31.6 ± 0.8

30.2 ± 0.9

NMC+SVM-RFE(H)

60.6 ± 1.0

51.4 ± 1.0

48.4 ± 1.0

43.4 ± 0.9

38.0 ± 0.8

NMC+SVM-RFE(S)

60.8 ± 1.0

52.2 ± 0.9

47.3 ± 1.0

41.3 ± 0.9

39.0 ± 0.9

MMC+MMC-RFE(U)

46.0 ± 0.9

37.3 ± 0.8

33.7 ± 0.8

29.0 ± 0.9

25.0 ± 0.7

MMC+MMC-RFE(O)

49.0 ± 1.0

38.6 ± 0.9

34.3 ± 0.9

30.4 ± 0.8

28.7 ± 0.9

SVM+SVM-RFE(H)

64.7 ± 1.2

54.3 ± 1.1

47.7 ± 1.0

42.0 ± 0.9

35.9 ± 0.9

SVM+SVM-RFE(S)

59.9 ± 1.1

50.3 ± 1.0

46.2 ± 1.0

42.8 ± 1.1

35.8 ± 0.9

  1. The average error and standard error rates (%) for CNS and NCI60, when the number of genes is {10, 20, 30, 50, 100}. SVM-RFE(S) shows the best result with respect to the C parameter; NMC+SVM-RFE(S): C = 10, SVM+SVM-RFE(S): C = 0.1 for CNS; NMC+SVM-RFE(S): C = 100, SVM+SVM-RFE(S): C = 0.1 for NCI60.