Table 2 Compare traditional CFM with four current methods
From: Improved Chou-Fasman method for protein secondary structure prediction
Method | Q3(%) | QH(%) | QE(%) | QHPRE (%) | QEPRE (%) | SOV (%) | SOVH (%) | SOVE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFM | 46.88 | 55.64 | 60.77 | 49.22 | 34.40 | 36.26 | 42.63 | 43.95 |
DSC | 69.10 | 63.65 | 54.95 | 73.70 | 71.31 | 66.19 | 63.14 | 60.86 |
NNSSP | 72.31 | 64.93 | 55.28 | 80.42 | 73.34 | 67.32 | 66.07 | 63.40 |
PHD | 72.60 | 65.38 | 68.59 | 77.98 | 63.55 | 69.94 | 65.74 | 72.05 |
PREDATOR | 69.58 | 62.21 | 54.50 | 75.33 | 70.14 | 64.85 | 64.23 | 60.57 |