Skip to main content

Table 2 Compare traditional CFM with four current methods

From: Improved Chou-Fasman method for protein secondary structure prediction

Method Q3(%) QH(%) QE(%) QHPRE (%) QEPRE (%) SOV (%) SOVH (%) SOVE (%)
CFM 46.88 55.64 60.77 49.22 34.40 36.26 42.63 43.95
DSC 69.10 63.65 54.95 73.70 71.31 66.19 63.14 60.86
NNSSP 72.31 64.93 55.28 80.42 73.34 67.32 66.07 63.40
PHD 72.60 65.38 68.59 77.98 63.55 69.94 65.74 72.05
PREDATOR 69.58 62.21 54.50 75.33 70.14 64.85 64.23 60.57