Skip to main content

Table 9 Compare our method with 4 current methods

From: Improved Chou-Fasman method for protein secondary structure prediction

Method

Q3(%)

QH(%)

QE(%)

QHPRE (%)

QEPRE (%)

SOV (%)

SOVH (%)

SOVE (%)

Our method

56.10-

72.86*

68.17*

67.17+

53.35-

51.14-

60.89+

57.46+

DSC

69.10

63.65

54.95

73.70

71.31

66.19

63.14

60.86

NNSSP

72.31

64.93

55.28

80.42

73.34

67.32

66.07

63.40

PHD

72.60

65.38

68.59

77.98

63.55

69.94

65.74

72.05

PREDATOR

69.58

62.21

54.50

75.33

70.14

64.85

64.23

60.57

  1. Superscript marker with sign '*', '+', '-' means the accuracy of our method was better than, close to, worse than other four methods in these indices, respectively.
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us