Table 1 Performance differences among algorithms for the homopolymer of length 64.
From: An adaptive bin framework search method for a beta-sheet protein homopolymer model
Method | Temperature set | Time cut-off | E avg ± sd | E min | P – value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCSA [9] | annealed from 2.75 to 1.25 | 24 min (approx) | -349.3 (± 2.1) | -362 |  |
REMC [9] | linear 1.25 to 2.75 | 28 min (approx) | -368.2 (± 0.8) | -373 |  |
PHAT [10] | linear 1.25 to 2.75 | 1 hr 25 min (approx) | -380.4 (± 1.9) | -387 |  |
our MC | 1.25 | 24 min | -367.2 (± 1.7) | -370 |  |
our MC | 1.25 | 28 min | -367.4 (± 2.7) | -371 | 0.1367 |
our REMC | linear 1.25 to 2.75 | 28 min | -368.5 (± 2.1) | -373 | 0.3425 |
our PHAT | linear 1.3 to 2.75 | 28 min | -367.5 (± 3.3) | -372 | 0.1599 |
our BINMC | T MC = 1.25, T bin = 6.521 | 28 min | -370.3 (± 4.3) | -379 |  |
our MC | 1.25 | 1 hr 25 min | -368.2 (± 4.6) | -374 | 0.0006* |
our REMC | linear 1.25 to 2.75 | 1 hr 25 min | -369.4 (± 3.0) | -376 | 0.0008* |
our PHAT | linear 1.3 to 2.75 | 1 hr 25 min | -369.5 (± 3.2) | -376 | 0.0023* |
our BINMC | T MC = 1.25, T bin = 6.521 | 1 hr 25 min | -375.7 (± 3.8) | -383 |  |