Skip to main content

Table 3 P-values comparing power by different methods.

From: Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures

 

ρ

True π0

BY

SampG.q

SampS.q

SampG.m

SampS.m

Data-B

0.3

0.9

3.71E-17

1.10E-04

1.06E-04

2.06E-02

8.37E-03

  

0.8

2.74E-31

3.93E-05

2.97E-05

1.94E-03

5.58E-04

  

0.7

7.82E-34

7.72E-08

2.57E-08

3.20E-07

1.09E-07

  

0.6

4.48E-48

8.31E-12

9.01E-12

2.78E-12

5.55E-13

 

0.5

0.9

1.67E-08

4.95E-03

3.35E-03

3.73E-02

7.94E-03

  

0.8

1.06E-13

7.70E-04

6.05E-06

4.06E-02

9.28E-04

  

0.7

6.42E-15

2.14E-03

1.12E-04

1.60E-02

2.37E-03

  

0.6

1.28E-17

5.55E-04

1.77E-06

2.99E-03

1.41E-04

 

0.7

0.9

9.89E-03

8.65E-02

4.81E-02

6.76E-02

5.24E-02

  

0.8

4.72E-06

2.38E-02

1.11E-02

2.89E-02

1.73E-02

  

0.7

2.65E-08

1.53E-01

7.25E-03

2.85E-01

5.92E-02

  

0.6

1.73E-06

1.19E-01

2.52E-02

1.25E-01

5.93E-02

Data-M

 

0.9

1.77E-53

9.78E-05

1.00E-06

3.66E-03

1.37E-05

  

0.8

1.69E-62

3.05E-06

2.16E-10

3.52E-04

7.14E-08

  

0.7

1.53E-74

5.27E-03

4.66E-08

3.86E-01

6.87E-03

  

0.6

2.37E-80

2.05E-04

3.42E-10

2.49E-01

1.34E-05

  1. The actual power in gene selections across the 100 simulations under each configuration by these methods was compared to that of q-value method using one-tail paired t-statistics.