Table 4 The comparison of performance of hybrid model and MEME/MAST model
| Â | Percent accuracy | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E-value | Cytoplasmic | Integral Membrane | Secretory | Membrane -attached | Overall accuracy | Average accuracy |
1E-003 | 94.7 (0.0) | 87.8 (0.2) | 46.0 (40.0) | 65.0 (0.0) | 86.5 (2.4) | 73.4 (10.1) |
1E-002 | 94.7 (0.0) | 87.6 (1.5) | 46.0 (40.0) | 65.0 (0.0) | 86.3 (3.0) | 73.4 (10.4) |
1E-001 | 94.7 (0.0) | 87.3 (2.7) | 46.0 (40.0) | 65.0 (0.0) | 86.2 (3.6) | 73.3 (10.7) |
1 | 93.2 (0.3) | 86.6 (8.5) | 46.0 (40.0) | 65.0 (11.7) | 85.3 (7.3) | 73.2 (15.1) |
10 | 87.0 (0.9) | 85.3 (22.4) | 92.0 (100.0) | 91.7 (91.7) | 86.8 (23.2) | 89.0 (53.4) |
20 | 79.1 (0.9) | 85.3 (31.6) | 92.0 (100.0) | 91.7 (100.0) | 83.7 (28.1) | 87.0 (58.1) |
30 | 75.0 (4.4) | 84.3 (39.1) | 92.0 (100.0) | 91.7 (100.0) | 81.6 (33.1) | 85.8 (60.9) |