Table 4 Comparison with the TiCo, MED-Start, GS-Finder, and RBSfinder TIS prediction programs
Organism (data set) | # of genes | GC content | This method | TiCoa | MED-Starta | GS-Findera | RBSfinder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. coli (EcoGene) | 858 | 50.8% | 93.2% | 95.2% | 93.0% | 91.1% | (81.9%b) |
E. coli (Link) | 191 | Â | 96.3% | 96.9% | 96.9% | 93.7% | (80.0%b) |
B. subtilis (non-y) | 1243 | 43.5% | 92.7% | 89.7% | 91.2% | 90.3% | (78.5%b) |
B. subtilis | 58 | Â | 96.6% | 91.4% | 96.6% | 96.6% | (82.8%b) |
P. aeruginosa | 347 | 66.6% | 92.8% | 90.5% | 67.1% | 91.1% | - |
B. pseudomallei | 238 | 68.1% | 89.9% | 86.6% | 3.4% | 87.8% | - |
H. arsenicoxydans | 162 | 54.3% | 92.6% | - | 87.7% | 89.5% | - |