Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of EasyBack with TIP and BACKTRANSEQ based on percentages of amino acids correctly decoded.

From: Sequence similarity is more relevant than species specificity in probabilistic backtranslation

Test ID EasyBack-FB EasyBack-Vit TIP BACKTRANSEQ
YWHAG 0.64 0.66 0.53 0.66
YWHAE 0.53 0.55 0.37 0.38
HIST4H4 0.57 0.55 0.46 0.48
TBP 0.68 0.68 0.43 0.44
SOD2 0.72 0.70 0.44 0.49
MYH9 0.59 0.58 0.45 0.53
TYR 0.75 0.76 0.45 0.39
HBA2 0.82 0.83 0.70 0.75
HBB 0.84 0.84 0.63 0.59
FGA 0.57 0.54 0.35 0.39
RPL36A 0.92 0.92 0.52 0.51
RPS6KA1 0.66 0.65 0.42 0.59
NP_438418.1 0.49 0.47 0.05 0.18
  1. Easyback and TIP were tested using BLAST All-Species training sets. BACKTRANSEQ used Species-Specific training sets. For all systems, each training set comprised 100 sequences. EasyBack-FB and EasyBack-Vit denote Forward-Backward and Viterbi, respectively. See Figure 13.