Skip to main content

Table 2 Percentage of S/MARs and pseudo-S/MARs predicted by each method by type of sequence

From: A comparative study of S/MAR prediction tools

 

Positive

Background

Negative

Coding

E. coli

MRS

24.8%

20.6%

7.9%

1.2%

7.0%

SMARTest

19.4%

11.8%

0.0%

0.3%

0.6%

  1. Two or more hits for the same S/MAR counted as one.