From: Bayesian meta-analysis models for microarray data: a comparative study
 |  | p s = 5% | p s = 10% | p s = 25% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Two-Study Simulation Data | SEI | PI | SEI | PI | SEI | PI | |
Low: mean = 0.1 (DE); 0.01 (non DE) | t IDR, γ = 0.95 | 24.6% | 29.9% | 12.9% | 18.9% | 3.8% | 9.0% |
 | t IRR, γ = 0.95 | 3.7% | 0% | 2.9% | 1.4% | 6.2% | 1.5% |
 | True Genes, pe FDR = 5% | 84 | 92 | 183 | 196 | 479 | 513 |
Medium: mean = 0.3 (DE); 0.03 (non DE) | t IDR, γ = 0.95 | 11.2% | 19.5% | 10.8% | 16.2% | 2.6% | 6.4% |
 | t IRR, γ = 0.95 | 16.4% | 7.5% | 15.9% | 4.5% | 16.4% | 3.1% |
 | True Genes, pe FDR = 5% | 80 | 97 | 185 | 211 | 493 | 547 |
High: mean = 0.7(DE); 0.07(non DE) | t IDR, γ = 0.95 | 11.0% | 15.3% | 5.4% | 7.6% | 2.9% | 4.9% |
 | t IRR, γ = 0.95 | 16.7% | 7.7% | 19.9% | 6.6% | 16.0% | 4.8% |
 | True Genes, pe FDR = 5% | 93 | 105 | 212 | 235 | 572 | 617 |