Skip to main content

Table 5 GO terms. Rule reduction rate

From: Fuzzy association rules for biological data analysis: A case study on yeast

Variables

Number of rules before

Number of rules after

Rule reduction rate

Molecular Function & Structural variables

38

20

47%

Biological Process & Structural variables

11

7

36%

Cellular Component & Structural variables

24

12

50%

Protein abundance & Molecular Function

34

19

44%

Protein abundance & Biological Process

37

21

43%

Protein abundance & Cellular Component

23

14

39%

Responsiveness & Molecular Function

45

23

49%

Responsiveness & Biological Process

28

19

32%

Responsiveness & Cellular Component

50

19

62%

TATA box & Molecular Function

53

26

51%

TATA box & Biological Process

17

15

12%

TATA box & Cellular Component

37

12

68%

Cho et al. – EDA (grouping 1)

24

23

4%

Cho et al. – EDA (grouping 2)

6

6

0%

Cho et al. – G&S SHAVING (grouping 1)

98

45

54%

Cho et al. – G&S SHAVING (grouping 2)

79

36

54%

Gasch et al. – EDA (grouping 1)

21

17

19%

Gasch et al. – EDA (grouping 2)

25

21

16%

Gasch et al. – G&S SHAVING (grouping 1)

95

56

41%

Gasch et al. – G&S SHAVING (grouping 2)

77

35

55%

  1. This table shows the number of rules obtained in the experiments where GO terms are involved before and after applying the rule reduction. There is also a column indicating the rule reduction rate.