Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Testing results for different basic variants of the statistics.

From: The comparative analysis of statistics, based on the likelihood ratio criterion, in the automated annotation problem

Statistic N 1 N 2 N all P(1) + P(2) P(1) + P(+)
η[1,1] 118 102 220 0.113 0.188
η[1,0] 130 104 234 0.123 0.201
η[0,1] 136 106 242 0.129 0.208
η[0,0] 164 103 267 0.152 0.232
T(1)[1,0] 213 83 296 0.191 0.260
T(2)[1,1] 172 124 296 0.162 0.256
T(2)[0,1] 216 103 319 0.196 0.281
T(2)[1,0] 180 141 321 0.171 0.277
T(1)[0,0] 200 124 324 0.185 0.283
T ^ ( 2 ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGafmivaqLbaKaadaahaaWcbeqaaiabcIcaOiabikdaYiabcMcaPaaaaaa@2FE5@ [0,1] 189 136 325 0.178 0.282
T ^ ( 2 ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGafmivaqLbaKaadaahaaWcbeqaaiabcIcaOiabikdaYiabcMcaPaaaaaa@2FE5@ [0,0] 234 111 345 0.213 0.304
T ^ ( 2 ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGafmivaqLbaKaadaahaaWcbeqaaiabcIcaOiabikdaYiabcMcaPaaaaaa@2FE5@ [0,0] 205 148 353 0.193 0.307
T ^ ( 2 ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGafmivaqLbaKaadaahaaWcbeqaaiabcIcaOiabikdaYiabcMcaPaaaaaa@2FE5@ [1,1] 142 217 359 0.148 0.294
T ^ ( 2 ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGacaGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGafmivaqLbaKaadaahaaWcbeqaaiabcIcaOiabikdaYiabcMcaPaaaaaa@2FE5@ [1,0] 164 224 388 0.167 0.321
q 393 158 551 0.354 0.502
S And 332 174 506 0.304 0.489
  1. The table shows the testing results of the different statistics for n all = 9236 'predictions'. In n q = 1176 cases the "predicted word" belonged to the sequence, in n all - n q = 8060 it did not. N1 denotes the number of false negatives, N2 is the number of false positives. Nall= N1 + N2, P(1) = N1/n q , P(2) = N2/(n all - n q ) and P(+) = N2/N2 + (n q - N1)). See the main text for the description of the variants.