Skip to main content

Table 1 The clusters of the two networks in Figure 2.

From: PhyloNet: a software package for analyzing and reconstructing reticulate evolutionary relationships

Network N1

Network N2

{B, C}

{B, C}

{C, D}

{C, D}

{B, C, D}

{B, C, D}

{D, E}

{D, E}

{E, F}

{E, F}

{D, E, F}

{D, E, F}

{B, C, D, E, F}

{B, C, D, E, F}

{A, B, C}

{A, B, C}

{A, B, C, D}

{A, B, C, D}

{A, B, C, D, E, F}

{A, B, C, D, E, F}

{E, F, G}

{E, F, H}

{D, E, F, G}

{D, E, F, H}

{G, H}

{G, H}

{D, E, F, G, H}

{D, E, F, G, H}

  1. A table of the (nontrivial) clusters of the two networks N1 and N2 in Figure 2, denoted by C MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaWenfgDOvwBHrxAJfwnHbqeg0uy0HwzTfgDPnwy1aaceaGae8NaXpeaaa@374D@ (N1) and C MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaWenfgDOvwBHrxAJfwnHbqeg0uy0HwzTfgDPnwy1aaceaGae8NaXpeaaa@374D@ (N2), respectively, in the text. Highlighted are rows corresponding to clusters that differ between the two networks.
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us