Table 2 Improvement of protein secondary structure prediction with the addition of two "residue-specific" RSA thresholds, compared with this improvement using a fixed [4%, 16%] RSA threshold.
From: Impact of residue accessible surface area on the prediction of protein secondary structures
| Â | Applied Threshold | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|  | Fixed([4%,16%]) | Mean ± standard deviation | Tertiles |
A | -3.03 | -0.83 | -0.93 |
C | 2.63 | 1.92 | 0.74 |
D | -0.95 | 1.70 | 1.50 |
E | -2.54 | -1.02 | 3.98 |
F | 0.71 | 10.14 | 9.44 |
G | 0.90 | 9.28 | 7.94 |
H | -4.30 | -2.14 | -3.30 |
I | -7.49 | -14.49 | -15.16 |
K | 10.37 | 26.73 | 13.31 |
L | 3.04 | 4.14 | 2.87 |
M | -3.58 | -5.45 | -5.57 |
N | -1.21 | 2.46 | -0.10 |
P | 1.14 | 2.47 | 1.84 |
Q | 0.53 | 0.07 | -0.76 |
R | 2.80 | 5.10 | 3.04 |
S | 4.36 | 13.13 | 12.32 |
T | 3.27 | 8.84 | 5.81 |
V | 1.57 | 0.13 | -5.72 |
W | -2.30 | 0.40 | 0.25 |
Y | 4.17 | 9.73 | 10.30 |
Total Improvement | 5.44 | 8.24 | 7.17 |