Skip to main content

Table 2 Improvement of protein secondary structure prediction with the addition of two "residue-specific" RSA thresholds, compared with this improvement using a fixed [4%, 16%] RSA threshold.

From: Impact of residue accessible surface area on the prediction of protein secondary structures

  Applied Threshold
  Fixed([4%,16%]) Mean ± standard deviation Tertiles
A -3.03 -0.83 -0.93
C 2.63 1.92 0.74
D -0.95 1.70 1.50
E -2.54 -1.02 3.98
F 0.71 10.14 9.44
G 0.90 9.28 7.94
H -4.30 -2.14 -3.30
I -7.49 -14.49 -15.16
K 10.37 26.73 13.31
L 3.04 4.14 2.87
M -3.58 -5.45 -5.57
N -1.21 2.46 -0.10
P 1.14 2.47 1.84
Q 0.53 0.07 -0.76
R 2.80 5.10 3.04
S 4.36 13.13 12.32
T 3.27 8.84 5.81
V 1.57 0.13 -5.72
W -2.30 0.40 0.25
Y 4.17 9.73 10.30
Total Improvement 5.44 8.24 7.17
  1. The values show percentage of improvement using leave-one-out cross-validation. The bold-underlined values are those values that show improvements when they are compared with the original GOR method. See the text for more details.