Table 3 MQAPs ability to detect most accurate model in set of alternative models (analysis performed on a set of all CASP7 server models).
From: MetaMQAP: A meta-server for the quality assessment of protein models
| Â | Â | Percentile of GDT_TS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method | average GDT_TS of top-ranked models | 1 | 5 | 25 | 50 (median) | 75 | 95 | 99 |
QA_634 | 57.74 | 8.85 | 18.1 | 35.38 | 57.32 | 73.63 | 93.70 | 96.85 |
QA_556 | 64.03 | 13.11 | 17.66 | 46.60 | 68.24 | 81.01 | 94.71 | 99.14 |
QA_704 | 62.23 | 16.65 | 22.31 | 40.90 | 62.97 | 78.56 | 93.34 | 97.10 |
QA_713 | 64.67 | 15.34 | 21.65 | 41.78 | 68.17 | 81.58 | 95.15 | 97.07 |
MetaMQAP | 60.78 | 14.93 | 20.39 | 37.75 | 64.13 | 81.11 | 95.64 | 98.18 |
ProQ | 59.53 | 14.78 | 19.09 | 32.67 | 62.56 | 76.32 | 94.63 | 97.28 |
Best server model | 70.93 | 23.20 | 30.98 | 54.63 | 72.05 | 85.47 | 96.13 | 99.20 |