Skip to main content

Table 3 Gene-finding performance for genes where ReRanker-5g differs from Evigan-5g.

From: Reranking candidate gene models with cross-species comparison for improved gene prediction

 

Gene

Transcript

Exon

     

ALL

initial

internal

terminal

single

 

sn%

sp%

sn%

sp%

sn%

sp%

sn%

sp%

sn%

sp%

sn%

sp%

sn%

sp%

Evigan-5g

11.9

14.4

8.7

14.4

64.5

76.8

42.3

58.4

73.3

81.5

55.8

73.1

3.6

17.4

ReRanker-5g

23.6

28.6

16.6

28.6

66.11

79.6

45.1

63.0

73.9

83.5

59.3

77.9

13.5

64.3

GeneWise

18.8

21.5

14.4

21.5

56.4

75.7

32.5

49.2

66.9

88.5

41.2

55.9

9.9

14.7

Augustus+

30.2

33.5

21.9

33.5

67.4

76.2

46.7

62.2

75.3

80.1

59.8

74.3

16.3

23.0

Evigan-6g

19.0

23.1

13.7

23.1

67.5

79.1

43.8

60.7

76.8

83.3

58.7

77.3

2.8

17.4

  1. Performance on the 1746 loci where ReRanker-5g selected a lower probability Evigan-5g model based on cross-species comparison. Note that ReRanker-5g improves on Evigan-5g acrosss the board; italics indicates where other comparative approaches outperform ReRanker-5g (see text).