Skip to main content
Figure 8 | BMC Bioinformatics

Figure 8

From: Volume-based solvation models out-perform area-based models in combined studies of wild-type and mutated protein-protein interfaces

Figure 8

ASA-based and volume-based solvation ΔG models compared. Calculations for ΔG of mutant complexes, using ΔG models fit to wild-type complex data, with ΔGSC-ROT calculated for Locked interfacial sidechains, Minimal-HighSA repacking and ΔGROT-TRANS = 0. (a) ASA-based polar and non-polar solvation terms (R2 = 0.66). (b) Volume-based solvation (R2 = 0.68). Although there is little difference in R2, the spread in ΔGCALC within mutant systems (i.e. based on the same wild-type) is larger with volume calculations.

Back to article page