Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of comparisons of c-REDUCE (1 MM/S) with other programs on 37 "not-recovered" cases.

From: c-REDUCE: Incorporating sequence conservation to detect motifs that correlate with expression

 

c-REDUCE

PhyloGibbs [22]

  

Total (21)

16

16

  

Total (15)

c-REDUCE

 

Tree Gibbs Sampler [17]

 

True Positives

11

 

8

 

False Positives

3/14 (21.4%)

 

5/13 (38.5%)

 
 

c-REDUCE

PhyloCon [21]

Converge [21]

PhyloCon & Converge [21]

Total (35)

22

9

14

20

  1. The sub-tables list comparisons between c-REDUCE and several other methods. The total number of transcription factor datasets evaluated (Total) is not the same in each sub-table because results are not always reported for the complete 37 "Not-recovered" set. For Tree Gibbs Sampler, the authors report all motif predictions and the false positive rates can be compared with c-REDUCE. For that sub-table, "True positives" indicates the number of correct predictions and "False positives" indicates the number of incorrect predictions out of all predictions.