Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation and comparison of the performances of Pep-3D-Search.

From: Pep-3D-Search: a method for B-cell epitope prediction based on mimotope analysis

PDB ID

1jrh

1bj1

1g9m

1e6j

1n8z

1iqd

1yy9

2adf

1avz

1hx1

Average

CED ID

CE0179

CE0175

CE0058

CE0170

CE0096

CE0176

CE0199

CE0154

--

--

 

Epitope size

21

19

15

11

20

16

15

15

16

24

 

Antigen size

94

93

304

209

580

155

612

188

102

111

 

Pep-3D-Search

TP/PE

19/40

7/13*

10/39

11/36

20/35*

6/47

10/25

12/36

10/39

13/39

 

MCC

0.3902

0.1442

0.1394

0.2285

0.1856

0.0356

0.1030

0.2153

0.1643

0.152

0.1758

Sensitivity

0.475

0.5833

0.2564

0.3056

0.5714

0.1277

0.4

0.3333

0.2564

0.3333

0.3642

Precision

0.9048

0.3684

0.6667

1.0

1.0

0.375

0.6667

0.8

0.625

0.5417

0.6948

PepSurf

TP/PE

19/28

2/17

9/31

10/30

6/11

8/31

1/8*

10/18

14/25

12/25

 

MCC

0.4134

-0.0537

0.1257

0.2056

0.0596

0.1272

0.0067

0.1832

0.3348

0.1863

0.1589

Sensitivity

0.6786

0.1176

0.2903

0.3333

0.5455

0.2581

0.125

0.5556

0.56

0.48

0.3944

Precision

0.9048

0.1053

0.6

0.9091

0.3

0.5

0.0476

0.6667

0.875

0.5

0.5409

Mapitope

TP/PE

19/22

2/18

13/33

1/6

9/13

15/106

3/23*

0/10

6/9*

5/21

 

MCC

0.4224

-0.062

0.1899

0.0154

0.0909

0.2401

0.0209

-0.0173

0.1387

0.0135

0.1053

Sensitivity

0.8636

0.1111

0.3939

0.1667

0.6923

0.1415

0.1304

0.0

0.6667

0.2381

0.3404

Precision

0.9048

0.1053

0.8667

0.0909

0.45

0.9375

0.1429

0.0

0.375

0.2083

0.4081

  1. TP: number of true positives; PE: number of residues in the predicted epitope; TN: number of true negatives; FP: number of false positives; FN: number of false negatives; Matthews correlation coefficient ( MCC ) = ( T P â‹… T N ) − ( F P â‹… F N ) ( T P + F P ) ( T P + T N ) ( T N + F P ) ( T N + F N ) MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGaeiikaGIaeeyta0Kaee4qamKaee4qamKaeiykaKIaeyypa0tcfa4aaSaaaeaacqGGOaakcqWGubavcqWGqbaucqGHflY1cqWGubavcqWGobGtcqGGPaqkcqGHsislcqGGOaakcqWGgbGrcqWGqbaucqGHflY1cqWGgbGrcqWGobGtcqGGPaqkaeaadaGcaaqaaiabcIcaOiabdsfaujabdcfaqjabgUcaRiabdAeagjabdcfaqjabcMcaPiabcIcaOiabdsfaujabdcfaqjabgUcaRiabdsfaujabd6eaojabcMcaPiabcIcaOiabdsfaujabd6eaojabgUcaRiabdAeagjabdcfaqjabcMcaPiabcIcaOiabdsfaujabd6eaojabgUcaRiabdAeagjabd6eaojabcMcaPaqabaaaaaaa@613F@ ; Sensitivity  ( Se ) = T P T P + F N MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGaee4uamLaeeyzauMaeeOBa4Maee4CamNaeeyAaKMaeeiDaqNaeeyAaKMaeeODayNaeeyAaKMaeeiDaqNaeeyEaKNaeeiiaaIaeiikaGIaee4uamLaeeyzauMaeiykaKIaeyypa0tcfa4aaSaaaeaacqWGubavcqWGqbauaeaacqWGubavcqWGqbaucqGHRaWkcqWGgbGrcqWGobGtaaaaaa@4963@ ; Precision  ( Pr ) = T P T P + F P MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaagaart1ev2aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacPC6xNi=xH8viVGI8Gi=hEeeu0xXdbba9frFj0xb9qqpG0dXdb9aspeI8k8fiI+fsY=rqGqVepae9pg0db9vqaiVgFr0xfr=xfr=xc9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaaeqabiWaaaGcbaGaeeiuaaLaeeOCaiNaeeyzauMaee4yamMaeeyAaKMaee4CamNaeeyAaKMaee4Ba8MaeeOBa4MaeeiiaaIaeiikaGIaeeiuaaLaeeOCaiNaeiykaKIaeyypa0tcfa4aaSaaaeaacqWGubavcqWGqbauaeaacqWGubavcqWGqbaucqGHRaWkcqWGgbGrcqWGqbauaaaaaa@466F@ .
  2. *For the cases, the best prediction was found in the second-ranked candidate.