Skip to main content

Table 9 Comparison of prediction accuracy (%) for SCL16. Prediction accuracies (%) of using LOOCV on SCL16L and independent test on SCL16T are obtained from the paper [2]. The input data is sequence only (S) or sequence with accession number (AN).

From: ProLoc-GO: Utilizing informative Gene Ontology terms for sequence-based prediction of protein subcellular localization

Method Input data Features LOOCV SCL16L Independent test SCL16T
ProtLock [8] S AAC 28.7 25.3
Least Euclidean distance [9] S AAC 25.8 20.4
Ploc [10] S AAC and amino acid pairs 35.1 32.8
HSLPred [11] S AAC and dipeptide composition 33.1 34.5
ProLoc-GO S GO terms using BLAST 86.6 83.3
Euk-OET-PLoc [2] S with AN Hybridization of GO terms and Pse-AA 81.6 83.7
ProLoc-GO S with AN GO terms (No BLAST) 89.0 85.7