Table 9 Comparison of prediction accuracy (%) for SCL16. Prediction accuracies (%) of using LOOCV on SCL16L and independent test on SCL16T are obtained from the paper [2]. The input data is sequence only (S) or sequence with accession number (AN).
Method | Input data | Features | LOOCV SCL16L | Independent test SCL16T |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ProtLock [8] | S | AAC | 28.7 | 25.3 |
Least Euclidean distance [9] | S | AAC | 25.8 | 20.4 |
Ploc [10] | S | AAC and amino acid pairs | 35.1 | 32.8 |
HSLPred [11] | S | AAC and dipeptide composition | 33.1 | 34.5 |
ProLoc-GO | S | GO terms using BLAST | 86.6 | 83.3 |
Euk-OET-PLoc [2] | S with AN | Hybridization of GO terms and Pse-AA | 81.6 | 83.7 |
ProLoc-GO | S with AN | GO terms (No BLAST) | 89.0 | 85.7 |