Table 8 Comparison of PSSM and PSSM-2SP on the Barton dataset in terms of amino acid types
From: Real value prediction of protein solvent accessibility using enhanced PSSM features
| Â | Â | MAE (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Amino acid type | Occurence (%) | PSSM | PSSM-2SP | Improvement |
I | 5.5 | 9.7 | 8.7 | 1.0 |
L | 8.5 | 10.7 | 9.8 | 0.9 |
V | 6.9 | 10.6 | 9.6 | 1.0 |
C | 0.9 | 9.8 | 8.9 | 0.9 |
A* | 8.7 | 14.1 | 13.3 | 0.9 |
G* | 7.8 | 19.8 | 19.5 | 0.4 |
M | 2.0 | 12.3 | 11.3 | 0.9 |
F | 3.9 | 11.2 | 10.2 | 1.0 |
Y | 3.6 | 13.3 | 13.0 | 0.3 |
W | 1.5 | 12.4 | 11.8 | 0.6 |
H | 2.2 | 15.5 | 15.1 | 0.4 |
K* | 5.9 | 17.1 | 15.8 | 1.3 |
R | 4.5 | 17.7 | 17.0 | 0.7 |
E | 6.0 | 18.9 | 17.8 | 1.1 |
Q | 3.7 | 18.1 | 17.2 | 0.9 |
D* | 5.9 | 20.1 | 19.2 | 0.8 |
N | 4.7 | 20.4 | 19.6 | 0.8 |
S | 6.2 | 19.0 | 18.3 | 0.7 |
T | 6.0 | 16.9 | 16.0 | 0.9 |
P | 4.7 | 18.2 | 17.4 | 0.8 |