Skip to main content

Table 6 Plant mitochondrial genes used in this study and ratioDt values.

From: Is plant mitochondrial RNA editing a source of phylogenetic incongruence? An answer from in silico and in vivo data sets

Gene

N

L

E

Vg

Vc

Mg

Mc

ratioDt

atp1

7

1527.86

0.85

199

202

HKY+I

HKY+I

0

matR

8

2023.50

1.24

360

356

K80+G

K80+G

0

atp8

8

504.00

2.58

143

142

HKY+G

HKY+G

0

rps3

7

1670.14

2.93

483

472

GTR+I

GTR+I

0

nad1

7

980.57

4.90

71

63

HKY+I

HKY

0

ccb3

7

735.43

6.66

116

107

HKY+I

HKY+I

0

atp6

9

962.00

3.43

510

485

HKY+G+I

HKY+G+I

0.16

cox3

9

802.67

3.86

71

70

GTR+I

GTR+G

0.16

rps12

14

377.79

4.24

79

74

HKY+G

HKY+G

0.18

nad5

7

2012.14

1.99

139

124

HKY+I

HKY+I

0.25

rpl5

8

568.13

2.46

186

182

GTR+I

HKY+G

0.25

atp4

7

602.57

3.65

153

157

HKY+G

HKY+G

0.25

nad6

7

642.43

4.05

124

119

F81+I

F81+I

0.25

rps13

8

350.25

2.86

45

45

F81+G

F81+G

0.4

cob

10

1183.50

3.72

135

129

HKY+I

HKY+I

0.43

cox2

16

774.75

4.26

176

160

HKY+G

HKY+G

0.5

ccb2

7

621.00

11.27

75

72

HKY

HKY+G

0.5

nad3

19

363.00

14.05

86

72

GTR+G

GTR+G

0.5

atp9

16

234.19

6.41

81

72

K80+G

HKY+G

0.54

nad9

9

606.00

2.81

58

52

HKY+I

HKY+G

0.6

  1. Notes. K80, Kimura; F81, Felsenstein 1981; HKY, Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano; GTR, General time reversible; I, invariant sites; G, gamma correction.
  2. The editing percentage is calculated for each multiple alignment as the proportion of site patterns containing at least one editing event over the total number of site patterns.
For each gene, the number of sequences (N), the mean length (L), the editing percentage (E), the number of variable sites (Vg for genomic and Vc for cDNA), the evolutionary model (Mg for genomic and Mc for cDNA) and the ratioDt are shown.
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us