Skip to main content

Table 4 The dichotomy of the sentence expression for pathway representation: direct or indirect.

From: New challenges for text mining: mapping between text and manually curated pathways

reaction ID

reaction type

expected annotation class

direct (annotated)

indirect (not annotated)

R1

Binding

Binding

11

56

R2

Binding

Binding

16

20

R3

phosphorylation

Protein_amino_acid_phosphorylation

19

1

+ site information

Protein_amino_acid_phosphorylation

2

5

 

+ modifier information

+ (any) Regulation

4

1

 

R4

ubiquitination

Protein_ubiquitination

5

0

R5

degradation

Protein_catabolism

27

1

 

+ modifier information

+ (any) Regulation

6

3

R6

translocation

Localization

26

0

R7

Binding

Binding

23

12

R8

gene expression

Gene_expression (or Transcription + Translation)

5

9

R9

gene expression

Gene expression (or Transcription + Translation)

1

10

R10

processing

Protein_processing

5

12

  

total

150

130

  1. The sentences for pathway representation of each reaction were distributed by a direct or indirect expression. The direct expressions were annotated by ‘expected annotation class’ using GENIA event annotation, while the indirect expressions were not. The latter needs some ‘inference’ by the biological domain knowledge to construct the corresponding pathway.