Table 3 Comparison of average precision for various contig assembly tools
From: CAR: contig assembly of prokaryotic draft genomes using rearrangements
Tool | Closest reference | Top 10 | Top 20 |
|---|---|---|---|
CAR (PROmer) | 68.50 (73.91) | 56.54 (66.04) | 43.30 (40.00) |
SIS (PROmer) | 66.47 (73.91) | 54.96 (60.00) | 41.84 (38.98) |
CAR (NUCmer) | 63.71 (81.25) | 51.49 (56.25) | 35.36 (22.22) |
SIS (NUCmer) | 61.99 (76.92) | 50.54 (56.25) | 34.36 (20.99) |
OSLay | 61.86 (75.00) | 49.57 (59.41) | 38.00 (33.33) |
r2cat | 65.59 (79.17) | 48.38 (48.61) | 34.91 (26.67) |
Mauve Aligner | 60.19 (65.22) | 46.41 (46.88) | 32.88 (22.47) |
CONTIGuator | 58.95 (66.67) | 41.83 (42.33) | 28.23 (11.11) |
Projector2 | 57.85 (64.29) | 41.63 (37.50) | 29.04 (20.00) |
fillScaffolds (NUCmer) | 54.50 (59.26) | 40.34 (30.88) | 26.57 (12.40) |
fillScaffolds (PROmer) | 48.79 (51.46) | 37.14 (29.15) | 24.67 (12.50) |
ABACAS | 46.88 (50.00) | 31.54 (14.29) | 20.43 (0.00) |