Table 2 Comparison of EPMLR with other methods
From: EPMLR: sequence-based linear B-cell epitope prediction method using multiple linear regression
Methods | Dataset used | Performances | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sn (%) | Sp (%) | P (%) | Acc (%) | AUC | ||
ABCpred | BEOD | 57.19 | 51.75 | 54.24 | 54.47 | 0.547 |
AAP | 60.25 | 54.01 | 40.53 | 56.15 | 0.582 | |
BCPred | 65.04 | 51.87 | 41.28 | 56.38 | 0.615 | |
EPMLR | 81.79 | 45.87 | 64.07 | 63.83 | 0.728 | |
SVMTriP | SVMTriP | 80.1 | Unavailable | 55.2 | Unavailable | 0.702 |
EPMLR | 80.56 | 32.30 | 54.9 | 56.43 | 0.644 | |
LBtope | LFNR | 54.38 ~ 65.88 | 57.31 ~ 63.97 | Unavailable | 55.85 ~ 64.86 | 0.57 ~ 0.69 |
EPMLR | 60.76 | 56.14 | 57.99 | 58.45 | 0.62 | |