Skip to main content

Table 3 Ranking of all 36 combinations of Method and Sampling scheme (time, type) when drivers are known with respect to each performance measure

From: Identifying restrictions in the order of accumulation of mutations during tumor progression: effects of passengers, evolutionary models, and sampling

Method and sampling Conjunction   No conjunction
  Diff PFD PND FPF   Diff PFD PND FPF
OT-A, last, singleC 1 2 14 10   1 3 2 15
OT-A, last, wholeT_0.5 2 1 15 12   2 4 3 14
OT-A, last, wholeT_0.01 3 3 7 22   3 6 1 22
OT-A, unif, singleC 4 6 19 13   4 9 12.5 9.5
OT, unif, singleC 5 5 20 11   5 7 12.5 9.5
OT-A, unif, wholeT_0.01 8 11 16 24   8 11 5 24
OT, last, singleC 10 9 23 1   10 1 17 2
OT, last, wholeT_0.01 11 4 18 18   12 5 14 18
OT, last, wholeT_0.5 12 7 24 2   11 2 23 1
CBN-A, unif, wholeT_0.01 13 13 1 26   13 13 4 26
CBN-A, unif, singleC 14 16 2 28   15 15 9 29
CBN-A, unif, wholeT_0.5 15 18 3 34   14 16 8 31
CBN, unif, singleC 16 17 5 29   17 19 10 34
CBN, unif, wholeT_0.01 17 14 4 27   18 14 6 27
DiP-A, unif, singleC 31 28 31 4   31 30 31 6
DiP, last, wholeT_0.5 33 35 34 5   34 34 36 5
DiP, unif, singleC 35 31 33 3   35 32 33 3
DiP, unif, wholeT_0.5 36 36 36 6   36 36 35 4
  1. Methods have been ordered by their performance in the first performance measure. Best five methods are shown in bold. Only methods that are within the best five in at least one performance measure are shown (full table as well as tables split by S.Size are available from Additional file 2).