Skip to main content

Table 3 Ranking of all 36 combinations of Method and Sampling scheme (time, type) when drivers are known with respect to each performance measure

From: Identifying restrictions in the order of accumulation of mutations during tumor progression: effects of passengers, evolutionary models, and sampling

Method and sampling

Conjunction

 

No conjunction

 

Diff

PFD

PND

FPF

 

Diff

PFD

PND

FPF

OT-A, last, singleC

1

2

14

10

 

1

3

2

15

OT-A, last, wholeT_0.5

2

1

15

12

 

2

4

3

14

OT-A, last, wholeT_0.01

3

3

7

22

 

3

6

1

22

OT-A, unif, singleC

4

6

19

13

 

4

9

12.5

9.5

OT, unif, singleC

5

5

20

11

 

5

7

12.5

9.5

OT-A, unif, wholeT_0.01

8

11

16

24

 

8

11

5

24

OT, last, singleC

10

9

23

1

 

10

1

17

2

OT, last, wholeT_0.01

11

4

18

18

 

12

5

14

18

OT, last, wholeT_0.5

12

7

24

2

 

11

2

23

1

CBN-A, unif, wholeT_0.01

13

13

1

26

 

13

13

4

26

CBN-A, unif, singleC

14

16

2

28

 

15

15

9

29

CBN-A, unif, wholeT_0.5

15

18

3

34

 

14

16

8

31

CBN, unif, singleC

16

17

5

29

 

17

19

10

34

CBN, unif, wholeT_0.01

17

14

4

27

 

18

14

6

27

DiP-A, unif, singleC

31

28

31

4

 

31

30

31

6

DiP, last, wholeT_0.5

33

35

34

5

 

34

34

36

5

DiP, unif, singleC

35

31

33

3

 

35

32

33

3

DiP, unif, wholeT_0.5

36

36

36

6

 

36

36

35

4

  1. Methods have been ordered by their performance in the first performance measure. Best five methods are shown in bold. Only methods that are within the best five in at least one performance measure are shown (full table as well as tables split by S.Size are available from Additional file 2).
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us