Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of SAMtools, PINDEL, PRISM and indelMINER on simulated dataset with 3,723 deletions and 3,777 insertions

From: Identification of indels in next-generation sequencing data

SV caller

Observed indels

False-positives

False-negatives

SAMtools

6,491

172 (2.65%)

1181

PINDEL

7,239

328 (4.53%)

589

PRISM

7,406

301 (4.06%)

395

indelMINER

7,365

263 (3.57%)

398