Skip to main content
Search
Explore journals
Get published
About BMC
My account
Search all BMC articles
Search
BMC Bioinformatics
Home
About
Articles
Submission Guidelines
join the board
Table 1
Comparison of SAMtools, PINDEL, PRISM and indelMINER on simulated dataset with 3,723 deletions and 3,777 insertions
From:
Identification of indels in next-generation sequencing data
SV caller
Observed indels
False-positives
False-negatives
SAMtools
6,491
172 (2.65%)
1181
PINDEL
7,239
328 (4.53%)
589
PRISM
7,406
301 (4.06%)
395
indelMINER
7,365
263 (3.57%)
398
Back to article page