Skip to main content

Table 3 Average rank scores for the different methods on simulated datasets, using the accuracy metrics described in the main text and in Table 2

From: Efficient representation of uncertainty in multiple sequence alignments using directed acyclic graphs

  Low indel rate Medium indel rate High indel rate
  α C \(\protect \phantom {\dot {i}\!}\boldsymbol {\alpha _{C^{+}}}\) AMA α C \(\protect \phantom {\dot {i}\!}\boldsymbol {\alpha _{C^{+}}}\) AMA α C \(\protect \phantom {\dot {i}\!}\boldsymbol {\alpha _{C^{+}}}\) AMA
MinRisk (C), g=0 0.91 0.89 0.90 0.96 0.92 0.93 0.89 0.88 0.88
MinRisk (C), g=0.5 0.89 0.73 0.84 0.93 0.50 0.78 0.84 0.09 0.40
MinRisk (C), g=1 0.88 0.63 0.80 0.90 0.30 0.65 0.79 0.03 0.28
MinRisk (C +), g=0 0.86 0.98 0.96 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00
MinRisk (C +), g=0.5 0.89 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.86 0.94 0.94
MinRisk (C +), g=1 0.89 0.84 0.88 0.91 0.74 0.85 0.83 0.34 0.55
MergeAlign 0.65 0.40 0.48 0.80 0.46 0.58 0.73 0.36 0.45
S-Coffee 0.08 0.02 0.10 0.15 0.01 0.10 0.29 0.00 0.04
  1. Highest values for each column shown in bold.