Skip to main content

Table 3 Average rank scores for the different methods on simulated datasets, using the accuracy metrics described in the main text and in Table 2

From: Efficient representation of uncertainty in multiple sequence alignments using directed acyclic graphs

 

Low indel rate

Medium indel rate

High indel rate

 

α C

\(\protect \phantom {\dot {i}\!}\boldsymbol {\alpha _{C^{+}}}\)

AMA

α C

\(\protect \phantom {\dot {i}\!}\boldsymbol {\alpha _{C^{+}}}\)

AMA

α C

\(\protect \phantom {\dot {i}\!}\boldsymbol {\alpha _{C^{+}}}\)

AMA

MinRisk (C), g=0

0.91

0.89

0.90

0.96

0.92

0.93

0.89

0.88

0.88

MinRisk (C), g=0.5

0.89

0.73

0.84

0.93

0.50

0.78

0.84

0.09

0.40

MinRisk (C), g=1

0.88

0.63

0.80

0.90

0.30

0.65

0.79

0.03

0.28

MinRisk (C +), g=0

0.86

0.98

0.96

0.87

1.00

1.00

0.76

1.00

1.00

MinRisk (C +), g=0.5

0.89

0.92

0.92

0.93

0.94

0.94

0.86

0.94

0.94

MinRisk (C +), g=1

0.89

0.84

0.88

0.91

0.74

0.85

0.83

0.34

0.55

MergeAlign

0.65

0.40

0.48

0.80

0.46

0.58

0.73

0.36

0.45

S-Coffee

0.08

0.02

0.10

0.15

0.01

0.10

0.29

0.00

0.04

  1. Highest values for each column shown in bold.